Distinguishing Facts and Opinions: Enhancing Students’ Critical Reading Skills Using Pair Checks Method
Keywords:
Pair Checks Method, Critical Reading, Fact and Opinion, Cooperative Learning, Classroom Action ResearchAbstract
This study investigates the effectiveness of the Pair Checks method in improving eleventh-grade students’ ability to distinguish between facts and opinions in discourse texts. Conducted through two cycles of Classroom Action Research (CAR), the study shows significant improvements in student performance, engagement, and collaboration. In Cycle I, students demonstrated moderate improvement in their ability to identify facts and opinions, with an average score increase from 63 to 74.44. However, challenges such as limited student engagement were addressed in Cycle II, leading to further enhancements, with the average score rising to 81.33 and 83.33% of students achieving the minimum competency level. Observational data revealed improved classroom behavior, increased participation, and reduced disruptions, demonstrating the positive impact of the method. The findings support the application of cooperative learning strategies in fostering critical thinking, analytical skills, and media literacy. This study highlights the value of iterative refinements in instructional methods and suggests that the Pair Checks method can be an effective tool for enhancing students’ reading comprehension and critical engagement with texts. Future research could explore broader sample sizes and longitudinal studies to assess the long-term impact of this approach.
Downloads
References
Acharya, B., Sigdel, S., & Poudel, O. (2024). Analysis of Effectiveness of Collaborative Pedagogy Practices. NPRC Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(4), 172. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3126/nprcjmr.v1i4.70965.
Ahmed, A. O. A., & AbdAlgane, M. (2024). An Investigation of Cooperative Learning Strategies in Improving Students’ Comprehension Skills in the Context of English as a Foreign Language (EFL). Education and Linguistics Research, 10(2), 1. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5296/elr.v10i2.22096.
Ailiyyah, E. T., Pambudi, D. S., Fatekurohman, M., Kurniati, D., & Susanto. (2024). Development of LSLC-Based Collaborative Learning Model Learning Tools And Their Effects on Critical Thinking Skills. VYGOTSKY, 6(2), 71–86. Doi: https://doi.org/10.30736/voj.v6i2.1014.
Barry, G. (2022). Facts vs. Opinions: Helping Students Overcome the Distinction. Teaching Philosophy, 45(3), 267–277. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil2022413161.
Deutsch, M. (1949). A Theory of Co-operation and Competition. Human Relations, 2(2), 129–152. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674900200 204.
Gillies, R. (2016). Cooperative Learning: Review of Research and Practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39–54. Doi: https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3.
Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and Media Literacy: A plan of action. Washington DC: Aspen Institute.
Iringan, E. M. (2021). Instructional Exposure of Senior High School Students to Approaches that Promote Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills. Journal of Asian Research, 5(1), p1. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22158/jar.v5n1p1.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and Competition: Theory and research. Edina: Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2024). Cooperative Learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3 & 4), 85–118.
Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative Learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan Cooperative Learning.
Kagan, S., & Kagan, M. (2009). Why Do We Need Cooperative Learning? In Kagan Cooperative Learning. Clemente, CA: Kagan Cooperative Learning.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The Action Research Planner. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.
Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K.-T. (2003). Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect on Academic Self-Concept: A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58(5), 364–376. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.5.364.
Marzano, R. J. (1992). A Different Kind of Classroom: Teaching with dimensions of learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
McNiff, J. (2016). You and Your Action Research Project. London: Routledge. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315693620.
McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2002). Action Research: Principles and practice. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Ningsih, P., & Rosa, R. N. (2019). The Use of Pair Check Strategy in Teaching Reading Comprehension on Narrative Text to Junior High School Students. 8(1), 1–12. Doi: https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v8i1.102979.
Nurjannah, A. (2016). Peningkatan Pembelajaran Membaca Memindai Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Pair Check pada Siswa Kelas VIII Mts Masdarul Ulum Ogan Ilir. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 12(2), 105–116.
Ovavia, C., Sufyarma, S., Atmazaki, A., & Miaz, Y. (2022). The Effect of the Pair Checks Model on Learning Outcomes and Critical Thinking Ability in Elementary School. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 1563–1582. Doi: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i2. 1833.
Panitz, T., & Panitz, P. (2018). Encouraging the Use of Collaborative Learning in Higher Education. In University Teaching (pp. 161–202). United Kingdom: Routledge. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429459092-7.
Ramdani, D., Susilo, H., Suhadi, S., & Sueb, S. (2022). The Effectiveness of Collaborative Learning on Critical Thinking, Creative Thinking, and Metacognitive Skill Ability: Meta-Analysis on Biological Learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1607–1628. Doi: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1607.
Salu, D. L., Auliah, A., & Salempa, P. (2021). Pengaruh LKPD pada Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Pair Checks Terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Enrekang Kabupaten Enrekang (Studi Pada Materi Pokok Reaksi Reduksi-Oksidasi). ChemEdu, 2(1), 36. Doi: https://doi.org/10.35580/chemedu.v2i1.20426.
Sarwat, S., Iftikhar, I., Sahito, J. K. M., & Shahzad, W. (2024). Impact of Student Engagement in Language Support Classes Through Cooperative Learning: A Study of Pakistani Educational Institutions. Research Journal for Societal Issues, 6(1), 199–210. Doi: https://doi.org/10.56976/rjsi.v6i1.192.
Smith, A., & Tan, W. (2020). Enhancing Collaborative Skills through Pair Checks in Secondary Education. Journal of Educational Research, 113(4), 455–470.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4.
Tok, Ü. (2023). Effects of Cooperative Learning Method of Pairs Check Technique on Reading Comprehension. Elementary Education Online, 7(3), 748–757. Retrived from: https://ilkogretim-online.org/index.php/pub/article/view/1202.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weber, E. G. (1993). Varieties of Questions in English Conversation (S. A. Thompson & P. J. Hopper (eds.)). USA: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mita Nurindah Sari, Ramli, Puspa Sari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with journal of DIALEKTIKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Matematika agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- The author grants the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in DIALEKTIKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Matematika journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after published by DIALEKTIKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Matematika journal, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
